DINAMIKA POLITIK DAN PILKADA DI KOTA KENDARI: Analisis Pengaruh Media Sosial dalam Kampanye Politik Lokal

Yunita Simatupang

doi:10.35817/publicuho.v7i1.506

##article.authors##

Yunita Simatupang Universitas Halu Oleo

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v7i1.506

##semicolon##

Democracy##common.commaListSeparator## Gubernatorial election##common.commaListSeparator## Misinformation##common.commaListSeparator## Public sphere##common.commaListSeparator## Political contestation##common.commaListSeparator## Socialmedia

##article.abstract##

This study aims to analyze the role and impact of social media in political contestation leading up to the gubernatorial election in Southeast Sulawesi, utilizing the public sphere theory developed by Jurgen Habermas. The findings indicate that social media plays a significant role in enhancing political participation, particularly among younger, more tech-savvy voters. However, the study also identifies serious challenges related to the spread of misinformation and hoaxes, which can manipulate public perception and undermine the integrity of the democratic process. Therefore, it is crucial for candidates and their campaign teams to develop effective strategies to counter misinformation, and for the government and relevant institutions to enforce strict regulations on social media content during the campaign period. The conclusion of this study is that while social media holds great potential to strengthen democracy by increasing transparency and participation, its misuse can pose serious threats to political and social stability. Hence, appropriate strategies and strong digital literacy are necessary to harness social media as an effective tool in supporting a healthy and sustainable democracy in Indonesia.

##submission.citations##

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McNair, B. (2011). An introduction to political communication (5th ed.). London: Routledge.

Dahlberg, L. (2007). The internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 10(5), 615-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701658020

Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2012). Collective action in organizations: Interaction and engagement in an era of technological change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542

Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy’s fourth wave? Digital media and the Arab Spring. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Kruikemeier, S., van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112464837

Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28-41.