HUBUNGAN GOVERNMENT SIZE DENGAN KESEJAHTERAAN DI INDONESIA: Peran Moderasi Bonus Demografi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v7i1.344Keywords:
demographic dividend, dependency ratio, government size, government spending, welfareAbstract
People's welfare is one of the important goals in the RPJMN 2020-2045 and the Golden Indonesia Vision 2045. One of the government’s roles in realizing welfare is through fiscal policy in the form of government spending, which is assessed by the ratio of government spending to GDP or government size. This study aims to determine the relationship between government size and welfare, especially the role of demographic dividend in moderating the relationship between government size and welfare using panel data of 34 provinces in Indonesia in 2012-2021 and the Fixed Effect Model (FEM). The results show that an increase in government size reduces GRDP per capita, but the existence of a demographic dividend through a low dependency ratio is able to reduce the negative relationship of non-optimal government spending on GRDP per capita. As for poverty, government size is able to reduce poverty, but the presence of the demographic dividend has not been able to play a role in increasing government spending that is more efficient and targeted for the purpose of poverty alleviation. Furthermore, the diversity of regression results obtained based on Indonesia's sub-regions indicates that there are still inequalities in budget planning, the quantity and quality of human resources especially productive age population, and the availability of jobs.
References
Adioetomo, S. M. (2004). Age Structural Transitions and its Implication The case of Indonesia over a Century, 1950-2050. Seminar on ‘Age Structural Transitions: Demographic Bonuses, But Emerging Challenges for Population and Sustainable Development. Paris: CICRED.
Adioetomo, S. M. (2005). Bonus Demografi: Menjelaskan Hubungan antara Pertumbuhan Penduduk dengan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Tetap Dalam Bidang Ekonomi Kependudukan.
Ahmed, S. A., Cruz, M., Go, D. S., Maliszewska, M., & Osorio-Rodarte, I. (2014). How Significant is Africa’s Demographic Dividend for its Future Growth and Poverty Reduction? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WPS7134
Ahmed, S. A., & Cruz, M. (2016). Making the Most of Demographic Change in Southern Africa. Making the Most of Demographic Change in Southern Africa, August. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7798
Anderson, E., d’Orey, M. A. J., Duvendack, M., & Esposito, L. (2018). Does Government Spending Affect Income Poverty? A Meta-regression Analysis. World Development, 103, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.006
Armey, R. (1995). The freedom revolution. Regnery.
Asimakopoulos, S., & Karavias, Y. (2016). The impact of government size on economic growth: A threshold analysis. Economics Letters, 139, 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.12.010
Birdsall, N., & Sinding, S. W. (2001). How and why population matters: New findings, new issues. In N. Birdsall, A. C. Kelley, & S. W. Sinding (Eds.), Population matters: Demographic change, economic growth, and poverty in the developing world (pp. 3-23). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199244073.003.0001.
Bloom, D. E., & Williamson, J. G. (1998). Demographic transitions and economic miracles in emerging Asia. World Bank Economic Review, 12, 419–456.
Colombier, C. (2009). Growth effects of fiscal policies: an application of robust modified M-estimator. Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, 41(7), 899-912.
Cruz, M., & Ahmed, S. A. (2018). On the impact of demographic change on economic growth and poverty. World Development, 105, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.018
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation : A meta-analysis of effect of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/256406
Facchini, F., Melki, M., & Pickering, A. (2017). Labour Costs and the Size of Government. In Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (Vol. 79, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12140
Iradian, G. (2005). Inequality, Poverty, and Growth: Cross-Country Evidence. IMF Working Papers, 05(28), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451860474.001
Jain, M., Nagpal, A., & Jain, A. (2021). Government size and Economic Growth: An Empirical Examination of Selected Emerging Economies. South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, 10(1), 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277978720979889
Kim, D. H., Wu, Y. C., & Lin, S. C. (2018). Heterogeneity in the effects of government size and governance on economic growth. Economic Modelling, 68(October 2016), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.014
Kurniawan, K., & Roberto, R. E. (2022). Keterkaitan bonus demografi dan kemiskinan di Kalimantan Utara. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 19(2), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.30872/jkin.v19i2.11060
Landau, D. (1983). Government expenditure and economic growth: a cross-country study. Southern Economic Journal. 49(3). 783-792
Lee, R. D., Mason, A., & Miller, T. (2003). Saving, Wealth, and Population. In Population Matters (Issue January). https://doi.org/10.1093/0199244073.003.0006
Mankiw, Gregory, N. (2008). Makroekonomi. Edisi Keenam
Mankiw, Gregory, N. (2018). Macroconomics.10th edition. New York : Worth Publishers.
Mason, A. (2001). Population Change and Economic Development in East Asia. Challenges Met, Opportunities Seized. Stanford, California: Stanfford University Press
Mason, A. (2003). Population change and economic development: what we have learned from the East Asia experience. Applied Population and Policy, 1(1)
Miller, S. M. & Russek, F. S. (1990). Co-Integration and error-correction models: the temporal causality between government taxes and spending. Southern Economic Journal, 57(1), 221-229
Musgrave. (1980). Keuangan Negara dalam Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta : Erlangga.
Nurkse, Ragnar. (1953) Problems of capital fomation in underdeveloped countries. New York : Oxford University Press.
Olaoye, O. O., Eluwole, O. O., Ayesha, A., & Afolabi, O. O. (2020). Government spending and economic growth in ECOWAS: An asymmetric analysis. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 22, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2020.e00180
Othman, N., Yusop, Z., Andaman, G., & Mansor, M. (2018). Impact of government spending on FDI inflows: The case of ASEAN-5, China and India. International Journal of Business and Society, 19(2), 401–414.
Patrick Flavin, A. C. P. and B. R. (2014). Assessing the Impact of the Size and Scope of Government on Human Well-Being Author ( s ): Patrick Flavin , Alexander C . Pacek and Benjamin Radcliff Published by : Oxford University Press Stable URL : https://www.jstor.org/stable/43287568 Assessing the I. 92(4), 1241–1258.
Pool, I. (2007). Demographic dividends: determinants of development or merely windows of opportunity? Ageing Horizons, 7, 28–35.
Pool, I., Wong, I. R., & Vilquin, E. (Eds.). (2006). Age structural transition: Challenges for development. Paris: CICRED.
Rambe, R. (2020). Inefisiensi Belanja Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia: Pendekatan DEA dan Regresi Logit. Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 5(4), 311 - 324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v5i4.175
Ravallion, M.(2004). Pro-poor growth: A primer. Working paper, World Bank Policy Research 3242-2004
Saez, Emmanuel. (2022). Understanding The Social State. Diakses dari https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2022/03/Understanding-the-social-state-Saez
Samosir, O., & Rajagukguk, W. (2017). Demographic and Competitiveness Acceleration and Government Sustainable Advantage in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(4), 113–118.
Samosir, O. B. (2023). Demografi sebagai ilmu untuk kesejahteraan umat manusia. https://feb.ui.ac.id/2019/06/14/omas-bulan-samosir-tipologi-bonus-demografi/
Samosir, O. B. (2023). Demografi sebagai ilmu untuk kesejahteraan umat manusia. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Tetap Dalam Bidang Ekonomi Kependudukan. Universitas Indonesia.
Samuelson, Paul A., dan Nordhaus, William (2001). Macro Economis, Edisi Terjemahan, Edisi 14. Jakarta : Erlangga.
Santika, A. R., & Qibthiyyah, R. M. (2020). Government size dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 20(2), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.21002/jepi.v20i2.975
Setiawan, S. A. (2019). Mengoptimalkan Bonus Demografi Untuk Mengurangi Tingkat Kemiskinan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Analis Kebijakan, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.37145/jak.v2i2.34
Siregar, O. K. (2022). Kebijakan Fiskal Dan Fertilitas Di Indonesia. CV. Pena Persada.
Suryawati, C. (2005). Memahami Kemiskinan Secara Multidimensional.
Sujoko, Aris. (2022). Bonus Demografi, Penduduk Menua, dan Kemiskinan Lansia. Diakses dari https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-6021260/bonus-demografi-penduduk-menua-dan-kemiskinan-lansia
Taruno, H. T. (2019). Public Spending and Poverty Reduction in Indonesia: The Effects of Economic Growth and Public Spending on Poverty Reduction in Indonesia 2009-2018. The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development, 4(2), 49-56.
Todaro, M.P., dan Stephen, C. Smith. (2006). Pembangunan ekonomi (edisi kesembilan, jilid I), Jakarta : Erlangga.
Udayana, K. A., Hidayat, A. S., & Yuniati, S. A. (2022). Relevansi Skala Optimum Belanja Pemerintah terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Financial Distress Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Maluku. Jurnal Manajemen Perbendaharaan, 3(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.33105/jmp.v3i1.426
World Bank. (2016). Demographic change and development : a global typology. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (7893).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Reny Maselati Margaretha, Khoirunurrofik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Every publication is open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violations.
Journal Publicuho this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Copyright ©2022 Author Powered by Public Knowledge Project OJS
