STRATEGI PEMBANGUNAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN, TEKNOLOGI DAN INOVASI DAERAH DI SULAWESI TENGGARA

Syamsul Alam; Faturachman Al Putra; La Ode Mustafa R

doi:10.35817/publicuho.v5i4.80

##article.authors##

Syamsul Alam Universitas Halu Oleo
Faturachman Al Putra Universitas Halu Oleo
La Ode Mustafa R Universitas Halu Oleo

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v5i4.80

##semicolon##

External environment##common.commaListSeparator## internal environment##common.commaListSeparator## regional innovation##common.commaListSeparator## science and technology

##article.abstract##

The purpose of this study is to describe the general conditions of regional science, technology and innovation (Iptekin) development, analyze opportunities and threats in the external environment as well as strengths and weaknesses in the internal environment, and formulate a strategic goals and objectives for the development of effective regional Iptekin in Southeast Sulawesi. This research uses a qualitative approach with an interpretive perspective. Data collection techniques used include interviews, document studies, benchmarking, and focus group discussions. Qualitative data analysis of the interactive model found that regional Iptekin development in Southeast Sulawesi is characterized by weak institutional and social and organizational fragmentation, and lack of resources. The overall factors of the political, economic, social, technological and legal environment contain opportunities and threats to the development of regional Iptekin but the dominant one is from the political environment. The factor of creating public value and assets/inventory are both internal strengths and weaknesses for the development of regional Iptekin. The strategic objective of regional Iptekin development based on environmental assessment is to increase the capacity of science and technology and the effectiveness of the implementation and utilization of regional science and technology.

##submission.citations##

Aldrich, H.E. and Zimmer, C., 1986. Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks. In The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship; Sexton, D., Smilor, R., Eds.; Ballinger: New York, NY, USA, 1986; pp. 3–23.

Antwi-Boasiako, K.B. 2010. Public Administration: Local Government and Decentralization in Ghana. Journal of African Studies and Development, Vol. 2(7), pp. 166-175.

Asian Development Bank, 2014. Innovative Asia: Advancing The Knowledge-Based Economy, The Next Policy Agenda. Philippines: ADB.

Attri, V.N., 2016. A Perspective on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: Need for International Coordination. Brief for GSDR.

Bekkers, V., Edelenbos J., and Steijn B., 2011. Innovation in the Public Sector Linking Capacity and Leadership. Netherlands: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bleeker, J., 2013. Strategic and Master Planning: Essential Roadmaps for Senior Living Communities. White Paper Life Care Services (LCS) Development.

Bourgon, J., 2007. Responsive, Responsible and Respected Government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol 73 (1): 7–26.

Bovaird, T., 2002. Public Management and Governance: Emerging Trends and Potential Future Directions. In Public Administration: An Interdisciplinary Critical Analysis, edited by Eran Vigoda. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Brito, Lídia, 2014. “Chapter 2: The Role of Science, Technology and Innovation Policies and Instruments for a Paradigm Shift Towards Sustainable Development”, in J. C. Bolay et al. (eds.), Technologies for Sustainable Development. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00639-0_2. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Damanpour, F., 1991, Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Contingency Models, Management Science, Vol.5, No.42

ESCAP (The United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific), 2016. Science, Technology and Innovation for Sustainable Development. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Seventy-second session, Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda, Bangkok, 15-19 May.

Evans, Peter B.; Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, 1999. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.

Fisman, R. & Eric Werker, 2011. Innovations in Governance. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11, p. 79 – 102.

Fuimaono, R.S., 2012. The Asset-based Community Development (ABCD) Approach in Action: An Analysis of the Work of Two NGOs in Samoa : a Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Philosophy in Development Studies at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Handayani, W., Setyono, Jawoto S., Sophianingrum, M., dan Z. Satria Kusharsanto, 2012. Kajian Pengembangan Sistem Inovasi Daerah (SIDa) Kota Semarang. Jurnal Riptek, Vol. 6, No.2.

Haruddin, A. R., dan Rezki, Nisa N., 2017. Mencari Solusi Peningkatan Daya Saing UMKM di Sulawesi Tenggara. Prosiding Seminar Nasional 6th UNS SME’s SUMMIT & Awards 2017, pp. 91-101.

Hill, Charles W. L., and Gareth R. Jones, 2012. Essentials of Strategic Management. 3rd Edition. South-Western: Cengage Lear.

Ismail, Alimin I., Raduan Che Rose, Jegak Uli, and Haslinda Abdullah. 2012. The Relationship Between Organisational Resources, Capabilities, Systems And Competitive Advantage. Asian Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, hal. 151–173, Maret 2012.

Jang, Seung H., 2013. The Offensive Framework of Resource Based View (RBV): Inhibiting Others from Pursuing Their Own Values. Journal of Management and Strategy, Vol. 4, No. 1, 62-69.

Johannisson, B., 1987. Anarchists and Organizers: Entrepreneurs in a Network Perspective. Int. Stud. Manag. Organ. 1987, 17, 49–64.

Juma, O. W. 2014. Organizational Resources, Corporate Governance Structures and Performance of Kenyan State Corporations. Disertation. Nairobi: School of Business, University of Nairobi.

Kertati, I., 2017. Inovasi Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Layanan Dasar Akte Kelahiran. Mimbar Administrasi, Vol. 1 No. 1, Oktober 2017.

Kimble, D., Boex, J., & Kapitanova, G., 2012. Making Decentralization Work in Developing Countries: Transforming Local Government Entities into High-Performing Local Government Organizations. November 2012. International Development and Governance (IDG) Policy Brief.

Kozan, M. Kamil and Levent Akdeniz, 2014. Role of Strong Versus Weak Networks in Small Business Growth in an Emerging Economy. International Journal of administration Science, 4, 35-50.

Kriswahyu, H., Renaldo, H., Rachmitasari, Diani I., Fajarwati, I., Daswati, O., Dewi, Olvi L., 2017. Laporan Hasil Inisiatif Ombudsman Tahun 2017, Kepatuhan Penyelenggara Terhadap Pemenuhan Komponen Standar Pelayanan Sesuai Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta: Ombudsman Republik Indonesia.

Lee, Soo-Young 2009. Impacts of Organizational Resources on Agency Performance: Evidence from Federal Agencies. citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10...pdf

Lee, Soo-Young and Andrew B. Whitford. 2013. Assessing the Effects of Organizational Resources on Public Agency Performance: Evidence from the US Federal Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Volume 23, Issue 3, hal. 687–712, July 2013.

Levitsky, S., and Murillo, María V., 2009. Variation in Institutional Strength. The Annual Review of Political Science, 12:115–33.

Levitsky, S., and Murillo, María V., 2017. Building Institutions on Weak Foundations: Lessons from Latin America. Forthcoming in Daniel Brinks, Marcelo Leiras, and Scott Mainwaring, eds., Reflections on Uneven Democracies: The Legacy of Guillermo O’Donnell. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Meijer, A., Reinout van der Veer, Albert Faber & Julia Penning de Vries, 2017. Political innovation as ideal and strategy: the case of aleatoric democracy in the City of Utrecht. Public Management Review, 19:1, 20-36.

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J., 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Washington DC.: Sage Publications, Inc.

Nedelea, S., & Păun, Laura A., 2009. The Importance of the Strategic Management Process in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Review of International Comparative Management, Volume 10, Issue 1, 95-105.

Nickols, F., 2016. Strategy Definitions & Meanings. Scientific Research, 1-14.

http://www.nickols.us/articles.html

O’Toole, Jr., Laurence J. and Kenneth J. Meier, 2013. Public Management and Performance: A Theory of Context. Paper presented at the 11th Public Management Research Conference, Madison, Wisconsin, June 20-22.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2015. Building more Effective, Accountable, and Inclusive Institutions for All. OECD and Post-2015 Reflections, Element 6, Paper 1.

Peet, R., and Hartwick, E., 2009. Theories of Development: Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives. Second Edition. New York: The Guilford Press.

Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Pembentukan dan Susunan Perangkat Daerah.

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 tentang Pedoman Penelitian dan Pengembangan di Lingkungan Kementerian Dalam Negeri dan Pemerintah Daerah.

Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Nomor 50 Tahun 2017 Tentang Rencana Strategis Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Tahun 2015-2019

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 38 Tahun 2017 Tentang Inovasi Daerah.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 58 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah.

Rosenbloom, David H., and Howard E. McCurdy (Editors), 2006. Revisiting Waldo’s Administrative State:Constancy and Change in Public Administration. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Sachs, W., 2010. The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. Second edition. London: Zed Books Ltd,

Saenab, 2017. Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan Melalui Program Home Care (Dottorotta) di Kota Makassar. Tesis S2 Administrasi Pembangunan. Makassar: Universitas Hasanuddin.

Simmonds, K., (1986), Marketing as Innovation; the Eight Paradigm, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 5, No. 23.

Sørensen, E., 2017. Political Innovations: Innovations in Political Institutions, Processes and Outputs. Public Management Review, 19:1, 1-19.

Sugiarto, A., & Mutiarin, D., 2017. Konsistensi Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Dengan Anggaran Daerah. Prosiding Interdisciplinary Postgraduate Student Conference 3rd, Yogyakarta.

Thoenig, Jean-Claude, 2011. Institutional Theories and Public Institutions.: New Agendas and Appropriateness. Peters B.G. and J.Pierre. The Handbook of Public Administration, Sage, pp.185-101.

Team FME (the Free Management eBooks), 2013. PESTLE Analysis: Strategy Skills. Diakses dari www.free-management-ebooks.com

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Nasional Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2002 Tentang Sistem Nasional Penelitian, Pengembangan dan Penerapan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi.

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 2009. Capacity Development: A UNDP Primer. New York: UNDP. Tersedia online pada http://www.undp.org/capacity, diunduh 22 Oktober 2016.

Vining, Aidan R., 2016. What Is Public Agency Strategic Analysis (PASA) and How Does It Differ from Public Policy Analysis and Firm Strategy Analysis? Administrative Sciences, 6 (19), doi:10.3390/admsci6040019

Willis, K., 2015. Theories and Practices of Development (Routledge Perspectives on Development). London: Routledge.