SURVEY COMMUNITY SATIFACTION INDEX DALAM PELAKSANAAN PROGRAM CSR PT ANTAM Tbk

##article.authors##

  • Maemanah PT. ANTAM Tbk
  • Anggoro Dwi Saputro PT. ANTAM Tbk
  • Firja PT. ANTAM Tbk

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v5i3.37

##semicolon##

Corporate Social Responsibility##common.commaListSeparator## Evaluation##common.commaListSeparator## Monitoring##common.commaListSeparator## PT.ANTAM Tbk

##article.abstract##

PT ANTAM Tbk as one of the mineral mining companies in Indonesia that is committed to implementing GCG has carried out its business operations that are oriented towards sustainable development. The existence of a CSR program is an important thing that is always optimized and improved in quality. Therefore, in the implementation of the CSR program, PT ANTAM Tbk continues to make efforts to minimize program failures by evaluating the implementation of the CSR program. In this study, the concept used is the result of an analysis of several sources, namely from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (KLHK in the KLHK Proper Green Guidebook (2013) explains that the CSI assessment consists of several aspects that are measured, including business indicators, effectiveness, efficiency, and quality.The effectiveness of community development programs is also taken from Sari (2019) sources to complete the indicators needed according to the conditions in the field. In the results, the CSI value of PT ANTAM UBPN Sultra is very good, with a value of 89.56, this value is obtained because the average program recipient is satisfied with the program carried out by PT ANTAM UBPN Sultra's CSR. The programs are implemented in accordance with the needs of the community and the performance of the program is also good. Although the value of community satisfaction is high, the program still needs to make improvements.

##submission.citations##

Aprilianti, L. 2008. AFIOlISis Pengimplementasian Coroporate Social Responsibility oleh PT ANTAM Tbk UBPE Pongkor dalam Pengembangan Komunitas. [skripsi]. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Bahruddin, Krisdyatmoko, Darmawan, D. A., & Soetomo. (2013). Indikator Proper Hijau Aspek Pengembangan Masyarakat (Community Development). Yogyakarta: Deputi Pengendalian dan Pencemaran, KLHK dan FISIPOL UGM.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Kolaka. 2020. Kabupaten Kolaka dalam Angka Tahun 2020. Diakses pada 10 Desember 2021.

Cresswell, J.C. 1997. ReSearch design, qualitative and quantitative approach. London: Sage Publications.

Dale, R. 2004. Evaluating development programs and projects. London: Sage Publications.

Grudowski P dan Pawe J. 2015. Szefler Stakeholders Satisfaction Index as an Important Factor of Improving Quality Management SystemS of UniverSitieS in Poland. Zarz'dzanie i Finanse Journal of Management and Finance Vol. 13 (2).

[ICMM] Metode Penerapan ICMM di Perusahaan Tambang. 2020. pada tanggal 1 Oktober 2021.

Indrayanti. 2017. Persepsi masyarakat tentang implementasi program corporate Social responsibility (CSR) pada PT. Aneka Tambang, Tbk di Pomalaa.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. 2013. Indikator PROPER Hyau ASpek Pengembangan IVIOS/0Takat. Jakarta: KLHK.

Marnelly TR. 2011. Corporate Social ResponSibility (CSR): Tinjauan Teori dan Praktek di Indonesia. Makara, Social Humaniora, Vol 1S (1) Juli 2011.

Nasdian, FT. 2014. Pengembangan Masyarakat (1st ed.). Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesianomor 14 Tahun 2017

Prayogo D. 2011. Evaluasi Program Corporate Social ReSponSibility dan Community Development pada Industri Tambang Dan Migas. Makara, Sosial Humaniora, Vol. 1 S (1), Juli 2011: Hal 43-58.

Sari EP. 2019. Perilaku Tanggung Jawab Lingkungan Masyarakat Ditinjau dari Efektivitas Program Pengembangan Masyarakat dan Efikasi Diri. Tesis. [Internet].

Soekanto, S. 2012. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sugiyono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods) (Sutopo, ed.). Alfabeta.

UN-ISDR. 2004. Living with TISk - fOcuS on disaster risk reduction. In Living with TISk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives (Vol. 1). DOI. 9211010640

Vol 5 No 3 - 2022

##submission.downloads##

##submissions.published##

2022-10-03

##issue.issue##

##issue.vol## 5 ##issue.no## 3 (2022): August - October - Journal Publicuho

##section.section##

Articles

##submission.license##

##submission.copyrightStatement##

##submission.license.cc.by-nc-sa4.footer##
License Term
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Every publication is open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violations.

Creative Commons License Journal Publicuho this work is licensed under  a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Copyright ©2022 Author Powered by Public Knowledge Project OJS