AKUNTABILITAS BELANJA DAERAH DI PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN LUWU UTARA

Dandi Darmadi; Hamsina; Muhammad Rusdi; Nur Indrayati Nur Indar

doi:10.35817/publicuho.v5i3.25

##article.authors##

Dandi Darmadi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur
Hamsina Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur
Muhammad Rusdi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur
Nur Indrayati Nur Indar Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v5i3.25

##semicolon##

Accountability##common.commaListSeparator## Regional Expenditure##common.commaListSeparator## Local Government##common.commaListSeparator## North Luwu

##article.abstract##

The purpose of this study is to analyze and find the supporting and inhibiting factors of regional financial accountability and specifically regarding regional expenditures for the North Luwu district government. The method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive type with data collection techniques including primary data and secondary data. The results of the study which were analyzed based on the four elements of accountability according to Jonathan Koppel showed that the Transparency Dimension still had weaknesses in terms of timeliness in budget preparation and access to public information. Dimensions of Liability, where the consequences of misuse of the budget for employees who are not actively working are required to be returned in the amount of Rp. 91,848,019. In the Control Dimension, the Internal Inspectorate Supervisor is still not optimal, such as the low value of the follow-up to the findings of the BPK-RI that has been completed, while the DPRD supervision is quite good. Meanwhile, the responsibility dimension is still lacking because there is an expenditure budget that is used in vain and does not bring outcomes, such as equity participation in PDAM Luwu Utara. The last dimension is responsiveness, which can be seen from 1464 proposals for musrenbang only 606 proposals are accommodated. In addition, there are also supporting and inhibiting factors in the accountability of North Luwu Expenditures.

##submission.citations##

Barro, R. and Grilli, V. (1994) European Macroeconomics. United Kingdom: Macmillan Press.

Carino, L. V. (2002) Administrative Accountability. USA: San Fransisco State University Fall.

Cutt, J. and Murray, V. (2000) Accountability and Effectiveness Evaluation in Non-Profit Organizations. London: Routledge.

Denhardt, J. . and Denhardt, R. . (2015) ‘The New Public Service Revisited’, Public Administration Review, 75(5), pp. 664–672.

Devas, N. (2008) Financing Local Government. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

Fatemi, M. and Behmanesh, M. . (2012) ‘New Public Management Approach and Accountability’, International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJMESS), 1(2), pp. 42–49.

Frink, D. D. and Klimoski, R. J. (2004) ‘Advancing accountability theory and practice: Introduction to the human resource management review special edition’, Human Resource Management Review, 14(1), pp. 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.001.

Ghartey, J. . (1987) Crisis, Accountability and Development in the Third World. United Kingdom: Gower Pub Co.

Gianakis, G. A. and McCue, C. P. (1999) Local Government Budgeting a Managerial Approach, معرفت ادیان. London: Greenwood Publishing Group. Available at: http://marefateadyan.nashriyat.ir/node/150.

Haimann, T. and Scott, W. G. (1970) Management in the Modern Organization. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Halim, A. (2012) Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Jabbara, J. . and Dwivedi, O. . (1989) Public Service Accountability. United States of America: Kumarian Press, Inc.

Koppell, J. G. S. (2005) ‘Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder”’, Public Administration Review, 65(1), pp. 94–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00434.x.

M.M Ludani, G.B Tampi, J. P. (2017) ‘Akuntabilitas Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah ( Suatu Studi Pada Dinas Pendapatan Daerah Kabupaten Banggai Kepulauan )’, Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintahan.

Mamesah (1995) Sistem Administrasi Keuangan Daerah. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Martines-Vazquez, J. and Smoke, P. (2011) ‘Introduction. Local Government Finance: The Challenges of the 21st Century’, ECON Publication, 55.

Muhammad Elwan, L. O., Rahman, R., & Fitri Cahyani, E. (2022). IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM PENANGGULANGGAN PRAVELANSI STUNTING ANAK BALITA PADA DINAS KESEHATAN KABUPATEN KONAWE. Journal Publicuho, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.35817/jpu.v5i2.25130.

Nurrizkiana, B., Handayani, L. and Widiastuty, E. (2017) ‘Determinan Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kepercayaan Public-Stakeholders’, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Investasi, 18(1), pp. 28–47. doi: 10.18196/jai.18159.

Piffner, J. . and Presthus, R. . (1967) Public Administration 5th edition. New York: The Ronald Press Company.

Polidano, C. (1998) ‘Why Bureaucrats Can’t Always Do What Ministers Want: Multiple Accountabilities in Westminster Democracies’, Public Policy and Administration, 13(1), p. 38.

Rasul, S. (2004) Pengintegrasian Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja. Jakarta: Percetakan Negara Republik Indonesia (PNRI).

Simon, H. A., Thompson, V. A. and Smithburg, D. W. (1991) Public Administration. United States of America: Routledge.

Sinclair, A. (1995) ‘The Chameleon of Accountability: Forms and Discourses’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2), pp. 219–237.

Wang, K. (2015) How to make sense of government accountability, World Bank Blogs. Available at: https://blogs.worldbank.org/governance/how-make-sense- government-accountability (Accessed: 16 July 2021).