RELASI POLITIK BIROKRASI DAN PERUSAHAAN PERKEBUNAN PT. JHONLIN BATU MANDIRI DI KABUPATEN BOMBANA

##article.authors##

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v6i3.247

##semicolon##

Bureaucracy##common.commaListSeparator## Clientelism Relations##common.commaListSeparator## Market Relations##common.commaListSeparator## Political Relations##common.commaListSeparator## Plantation Company

##article.abstract##

The purpose of writing this article is to find out the relationship between the bureaucracy and the company PT. Jhonlin Batu Mandiri in Bombana Regency. The research method used is a qualitative research type with a descriptive approach. The data analysis technique uses the opinion of Miles, Huberman & and Saldaña (2014) with an interactive model starting from data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions. Based on the results that have been obtained regarding bureaucratic relations and plantation companies which result in power politics in local government agencies that collaborate with entrepreneurs through clientelistic relations and market relations. As a result, in the regional relations position, bureaucratic and company cooperation occurred for the benefit of village infrastructure development, and in the market relations position, there was a claim for community plantation land from PT. Jhonlin Batu Mandiri in Tinabite Village, Lantari Jaya District, Bombana Regency. Market relations are short-term relations that are developed through the issue of company political promises to land owners, resulting in supply and demand

##submission.authorBiography##

##submission.authorWithAffiliation##

##submission.citations##

Buku

Abdullah, Taufik & Karim, Rusli. 1989. Metodologi Penelitian Agama Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Tiarawacana.

Brannen, Julia, 2005, Memadu Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Budi Setiono, 2005,, Jaring Birokrasi Tinjauan Dari Aspek Politik dan Administrasi”, Jakarta, Gugus Press

Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J C., 1963, Experimental and Quasiexperimental Designs For Research, Chicago, IL: Rand Mc Nally.

Creswell, John W, 2010, Reseach Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Dwiyanto, Agus, 2006, Reformasi Birokrasi Publik Di Indonesia, Gajah Mada University Press, Jogya.

Kunio, Yoshihara,. September, 1999, Kapitalisme Semu Asia Tenggara, Jakarta, LP3ES

Moleong ,lexy. (2005).Metodologi penelitian kualitatif.Bandung: PT.

Remaja Rosdakarya.

R.Martini., Pengembangan, Penjaminan,dan Pendidikan,(2013). Politisasi Birokrasi Di Indonesia.

Sutoro eko, (2004), Reformasi Politik dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, APMD Press, Yogyakarta.

Schmandt, Hendri. J. (2002). Filsafat Politik (Terjemahan Kajian Historis dari zaman Yunani Kuno sampai zaman Modern), Ahmad Baidlowi, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

Usman, Sunyoto. 2005. Esai-Esai Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial. Jogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Jurnal:

A, Gide. (1967). Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 4(1), 5–24.

Bakti, O. :, Ode, L., & Elwan, M. (2018). ANALISIS RESTRUKTURISASI BIROKRASI DALAM PENGEMBANGAN GOOD GOVERNANCE PADA SEKERTARIAT DAERAH KABUPATEN KONAWE UTARA. 1(3), 1–13. Retrieved from http://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/PUBLICUHO

D, Rofifah. (2020).Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 12–26.

Denhardt, R.B. & J.V. Denhardt, 2000. “The New Public Service”, dalam Public Administration Review, Vol 60, No. 6.

Emi Kholifah. (2010). Konsep Pertambangan. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1–24. http://teori- pertambangan-html.,

Grindle Merilee S. (1980). Policy Content and Context in Implementations in, dalam merilee s. Grindle Ced.

G.A, Usman ., Saleh, L. M. I., Negeri, M., Mangkurat, L., Kalimantan, P., & Usman, A. G. (1998). Bab i pendahuluan a. latar belakang. 1–10.

I, Hidayat. (2009). Kekuasaan Politik di Desa. Ilmu Politik, c

La Ode Muhammad Elwan, Muhammad Yusuf, & La Ode Herman Halika. (2022). MINING POLICY CONFLICT: Recruitment of Local Workers in Morosi Industrial Estate, Konawe Regency, Southeast Sulawesi. Journal Publicuho, 5(3), 626–642. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v5i3.18

Macintyre, Andrew. (1991). Business and Politics in Indonesia, Allen and Unwin Pty Ltd, Australia.

Muhammad Elwan, La Ode. "Problem Birokrasi dalam Meningkatan Pelayanan Publik pada Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Muna." Journal Publicuho, vol. 2, no. 2, 2019, pp. 31-42, doi:10.35817/jpu.v2i2.7223.

Vargo, and Lusch. (2004). ‘The Four Services Marketing Myths: Remnants from a Manufacturing Model’, Journal of Service Research 6(4): 324–35.

Widanarto, A. (2017). Praktek Rent Seeking: Budaya Korupsi Baru Di Kalangan Politisi dan Birokrasi Indonesia.Jurnal Politiokom Indonesian.

Yahya, Muhaimin, (1988) Kebijaksanaan Ekonomi dan Klientelisme, Yogyakarta, Pusat Antar Universitas-Studi Sosial Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Yahya, A. Muhaimin. (1990). Bisnis dan Politik:Kebijaksanaan Ekonomi Indonesia 1950-1980, LP3ES.

Dokumen perUndang undang:

Undang-undang Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 6 Tahun 2007 Tentang Tata Hutan Dan Penyusunan Rencana Pengelolaan Hutan Serta Pemanfaatan Hutan.

Undang-Undang No 18 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perkebunan.

Peraturan Mentri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Nomor/P.81/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/10/2016

Tentang Kerjasama Penggunaan Dan Pemanfaatan Pemanfaatan Kawasan Hutan Untuk Ketahanan Pangan.

Sumber lain (laman internet):

https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1246012/kebun-tebu-haji-isam-di- bombana-diduga-tabrak-aturan-tata-ruang

https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1245437/ada-menteri-pertanian-diduga- di-kebun-tebu-haji-isam/full&view=ok

https://www.sultranet.com/pt-jhonlin-di-duga-serobot-lahan-warga/

https://sultrapost.id/diduga-serobot-lahan-warga-pt-jhonlin-bakal-di-seret-ke-dprd-bombana/

https://sultrapost.id/pt-jhonlin-bantah-serobot-lahan-phk-sepihak-dan-tak-bayar-retribusi-pajak-imb/

https://zonasultra.com/pt-jhonlin-kuasai-20-ribu-hektar-lahan-bombana-peternak-dirugikan.html

##submission.downloads##

##submissions.published##

2023-10-04