DIKOTOMI PENEGAKAN HUKUM PELANGGARAN LALULINTAS TERHADAP PENGENDARA YANG TIDAK MENGGUNAKAN HELM DI KOTA KENDARI

Authors

  • Wa Ode Adriani Sukma Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
  • Sabrina Hidayat Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Kamaruddin Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v7i4.562

Keywords:

Law Enforcement, Traffic Laws System

Abstract

This research is based on the phenomenon of the people of Kendari City who think that riding on the road using a motorbike does not require wearing a helmet, especially at certain moments. This momentum such as the delivery of a corpse or even to the celebration of a democratic party, like a campaign in public areas. Some people of Kendari City only wear hats and peci (songko) at certain seasons, and some choose not to wear any head protection at all. Due to societal realities, the purpose of this research is to ascertain how law enforcement responds to drivers who don’t wear helmets in accordance with sociocultural circumstances and to understand Kendari City’s traffic law system from the perspective of Lawrence M. Friedman’s theory. The research method used is a normative-empirical method. The research results findings demonstrate that when law enforcement personnel’s roles are in conflict with the sociocultural context of Kendari City society, the application of Article 291 of the Traffic Law fails to work as best it might. At some times, including during campaigns or when delivering corpses, law enforcement officials in the traffic sector appear to find it difficult or impossible to enforce the law against drivers who don’t wear helmets. Therefore, the situation indicates that Article 291 of the Traffic Law’s traffic system doesn’t work as expected.

References

Bix Brian, “Radbruch's Formula and Conceptual Analysis”, J. Juris, Volume 56, Nomor 45, Tahun 2011.

Friedman Lawrence M., 1998, American Law an Introduction: Second Edition, Di terjemahkan Oleh Wishnu Basuki, (Terjemahan Buku Friedman Lawrence M., 1998, American Law an Introduction: Second Edition), Hukum Amerika Sebuah Pengantar: Edisi Kedua, Tata Nusa, Jakarta, 2001.

Handrawan, dkk., “Penegakan Hukum Pidana Oleh Bawaslu Atas Pelanggaran Pemasangan Alat Peraga Kampanye Di Kota Kendari”, Jurnal Delarev (Lakidende Law Review), Volume 3, Nomor 1, April 2024.

Khozim, M., (Terjemahan Buku Friedman Lawrence M., 1975, The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective), Sistem Hukum; Perspektif Ilmu Sosial, Nusamedia, Bandung, 2009.

Mertokusumo Sudikno, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2005.

Mochtar Zainal Arifin dan Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum: Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas dan Filsafat Hukum, Red & White Publishing, Indonesi, 2021.

Muhammad Abdul Kadir, 2004, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2004).

Naslim, 2023, ‘’ Pelanggaran Lalulintas di Kota Kendari Cukup Tinggi”, https://www.rri.co.id/lain-lain/429864/pelanggaran-lalulintas-di-kota-kendari-cukup-tinggi, diakses pada Rabu, 1 Mei 2024.

Saputra, La Ode Muh. Deden (Pewarta), “Polisi menemukan 1.678 pelanggar dalam sepekan operasi patuh di Kendari”, https://sultra.antaranews.com/berita/447234/polisi-menemukan-1678-pelanggar-dalam-sepekan-operasi-patuh-di-kendari, diakses pada Rabu, 1 Mei 2024.

Sumardjono Maria SW., Bahan Kuliah Metodologi Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi, Fakultas Hukum UGM, Yogyakarta, 2019.

Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 96, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5025).

Wicaksono Dian Agung dan Chryshnanda Dwilaksana, “Penegakan Hukum Lalu Lintas Jalan Secara Elektronik Sebagai Wujud Pembangunan Hukum Dalam Era Digital”, Jurnal Rechtsvinding Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Volume 9, Nomor 2, Agustus 2020.

Yoga Nugroho dan Pujiyono, “Penegakan Hukum Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas oleh Anak: Analisis Kepastian dan Penghambat”, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Volume 4, Nomor 1, Tahun 2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-26