IMPLEMENTASI CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PADA PT. ANEKA TAMBANG Tbk. UBPN SULAWESI TENGGARA

Authors

  • Candra Puspita Ningtyas Halu Oleo University
  • Makmur Kambolong Halu Oleo University
  • Munawir Makmur Halu Oleo University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v5i4.50

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, economic, social, enviroment

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility  (CSR) is very important for companies, especially by companies whose operational activities have an impact on the community and the surrounding environment. Especially mining companies are important to carry out CSR programs. CSR implementation is carried out as a form of corporate social responsibility. This research provides an overview of the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) implemented by PT.Antam, Tbk. Explained in the study of literature from the economic , social, and environmental aspects. The realization of CSR in the economic aspect is realized by PT. Antam, Tbk by contributing to the community and the Government which aims to increase the economic independence of sustainability and prosperity and contribute to the Government through the payment of non-tax state revenues (PNBP), taxes, and royalties amounting to Rp758.81 billion. Efforts to combat poverty in the Company's operational areas are realized in the Partnership Program in the form of capital assistance to foster partners. Enviromental aspects by ANTAM implements Good Mining Practice covering aspects healthy and work safety, environment responsibility, community development, post mining plan. CSR Antam is important because in addition to building a positive image by company for the welfare of the community so that there is a harmonious relationship between the company and the community as part of the stakeholder.

References

Aprilianti, L. 2008. AFIOlISis Pengimplementasian Coroporate Social Responsibility oleh PT ANTAM Tbk UBPE Pongkor dalam Pengembangan Komunitas. [skripsi]. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Bahruddin, Krisdyatmoko, Darmawan, D. A., & Soetomo. (2013). Indikator Proper Hijau Aspek Pengembangan Masyarakat (Community Development). Yogyakarta: Deputi Pengendalian dan Pencemaran, KLHK dan FISIPOL UGM.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Kolaka. 2020. Kabupaten Kolaka dalam Angka Tahun 2020. Diakses pada 10 Desember 2021.

Budimanta, Arif, Adi Prasetyo, dan Bambang Rudito. 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility: Alternatif bagi Pembangunan Indonesia. Jakarta:ICSD.

Cresswell, J.C. 1997. ReSearch design, qualitative and quantitative approach. London: Sage Publications.

Dale, R. 2004. Evaluating development programs and projects. London: Sage Publications.

Grudowski P dan Pawe J. 2015. Szefler Stakeholders Satisfaction Index as an Important Factor of Improving Quality Management SystemS of UniverSitieS in Poland. Zarz'dzanie i Finanse Journal of Management and Finance Vol. 13 (2).

[ICMM] Metode Penerapan ICMM di Perusahaan Tambang. 2020. pada tanggal 1 Oktober 2021.

Indrayanti. 2017. Persepsi masyarakat tentang implementasi program corporate Social responsibility (CSR) pada PT. Aneka Tambang, Tbk di Pomalaa.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. 2013. Indikator PROPER Hyau ASpek Pengembangan IVIOS/0Takat. Jakarta: KLHK.

Marnelly TR. 2011. Corporate Social ResponSibility (CSR): Tinjauan Teori dan Praktek di Indonesia. Makara, Social Humaniora, Vol 1S (1) Juli 2011.

Mardikanto, T. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility (Tanggung Jawab Sosial Korporasi). Alfabeta.

Nasdian, FT. 2014. Pengembangan Masyarakat (1st ed.). Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Ode, L., Elwan, M., Ido2, I., Alwi, L. O., & Putra3, H. W. (2018). KEBIJAKAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) PERTAMBANGAN DAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP KESEJAHTERAAN MASYARAKAT. Journal Publicuho, 1(1), 16–27.

Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesianomor 14 Tahun 2017

Prayogo D. 2011. Evaluasi Program Corporate Social ReSponSibility dan Community Development pada Industri Tambang Dan Migas. Makara, Sosial Humaniora, Vol. 1 S (1), Juli 2011: Hal 43-58.

Sari EP. 2019. Perilaku Tanggung Jawab Lingkungan Masyarakat Ditinjau dari Efektivitas Program Pengembangan Masyarakat dan Efikasi Diri. Tesis. [Internet].

Soekanto, S. 2012. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sugiyono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods) (Sutopo, ed.). Alfabeta.

Tanudjaja, B. B. (2006). Perkembangan Corporate Sosial Responsibility di Indonesia. Nirmana, 8(2), 92–98.

Theofilus, O. :, Ido, I., A 3 1 Mahasiswa, S., Jurusan, D., Universitas, F., & Oleo, H. (2019). Evaluasi Program CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) Perusahaan PT. ANTAM Tbk UBPN SULTRA Kecamatan Pomalaa Kabupaten Kolaka (Studi Kasus Desa Tambea). 1(1), 51–57. http://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/PUBLICUHO

UN-ISDR. 2004. Living with TISk - fOcuS on disaster risk reduction. In Living with TISk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives (Vol. 1). DOI. 9211010640

Wibisono, Y. (2007a). Membedah Konsep dan Aplikasi CSR. Fascho Publishing.

Wibisono, Y. (2007b). Membedah Konsep dan Aplikasi CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility. Fascho Publishing.

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). (2002). Corporate Social Responsibility : The WBCSD’s Journey. Conches.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-28