IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP TATA KELOLA PEMERINTAHAN TERHADAP KUALITAS PELAYANAN PUBLIK DI KOTA KENDARI PROVINSI SULAWESI TENGGARA

Authors

  • Muhammad Amir Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Adrian Tawai Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Muhammad Yusuf Universitas Halu Oleo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v6i3.341

Keywords:

accountability, effectiveness, efficiency, fairness, Governance, public services, responsiveness, transparency

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the implementation of governance principles on the quality of public services in Kendari City, Southeast Sulawesi Province. Qualitative descriptive research methodology which includes observation, interviews and documentation was used in this research. Data analysis uses descriptive interactive according to Milles Huberman and Saldana. The findings of this research indicate that the application of good governance principles in improving the quality of public services, in terms of transparency, has not been fully realized, especially regarding access to service requirements that cannot be reached by all levels of society. Second, responsiveness in responding to needs is quite good, but completion in a timely manner is not appropriate due to the large number of taxpayers quantitatively. Third, a fair aspect in providing services has been implemented by giving priority to the community in a timely manner. Fourth, the effectiveness and efficiency of employees can be seen, with their efforts increasing their potential to improve services. Fifth, employee accountability through reprimanding and directing staff who commit negligence, but there are still staff who repeat this negligence and act not in accordance with the SOP.

References

Agostino, D., Saliterer, I., & Steccolini, I. (2022). Digitalization, accounting and accountability: A literature review and reflections on future research in public services. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12301

Campbell, J. (2021). REPRESENTATIVE BUREAUCRACY, IMMIGRANTS, AND TRUST IN GOVERNMENT: A CROSS-NATIONAL STUDY. Public Administration Issues, 6(6), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2021-0-6-7-23

Chakravarthy, D. G., & Kannimuthu, S. (2021). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Mining interesting actionable patterns for web service composition. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12(6), 6181–6187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02187-5

Chen, L., & Cheng, M. (2023). Exploring Older Adults’ Perceived Affordability and Accessibility of the Healthcare System: Empirical Evidence from the Chinese Social Survey 2021. Healthcare, 11(13), 1818. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131818

Ezrow, L., & Krause, W. (2023). Voter Turnout Decline and Party Responsiveness. British Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000673

Indahsari, C. L., & Raharja, S. J. (2020). New Public Management (NPM) as an Effort in Governance. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 3(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmpp.v3i2.25342

Jafari, H., Ghaderi, H., Malik, M., & Bernardes, E. (2022). The effects of supply chain flexibility on customer responsiveness: the moderating role of innovation orientation. Production Planning and Control, 34(16), 1543–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2022.2028030

Kadarisman, M., Izzatusholekha, & Putra, N. (2021). Dinamika politik dalam reformasi administrasi publik. Kajian Ilmu Sosial, 2(1), 24–40.

Kazancoglu, I., Ozbiltekin-Pala, M., Kumar Mangla, S., Kazancoglu, Y., & Jabeen, F. (2022). Role of flexibility, agility and responsiveness for sustainable supply chain resilience during COVID-19. Journal of Cleaner Production, 362(January), 132431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132431

Krueger, K., & Forest, A. (2022). Putting responsiveness in context: How a partner’s responsiveness baseline shapes perceived responsiveness. Personal Relationships, 29(4), 857–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12447

Lionandiva, G., & Triandi, T. (2022). Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Good Governance Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Pada Kantor Badan Pendapatan Daerah Kota Bogor. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 10(3), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v10i3.1604

Loka, D. M., Akhyar Abdullah, & Sudirman, F. A. (2022). Identifikasi Pelayanan Publik Berbasis E-Government Pemerintah Kota Kendari Pada Masa New Normal. NeoRespublica: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 4(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.52423/neores.v4i1.51

Manika, S. (2020). Mechanisms for Innovative-Driven Solutions in European Smart Cities. Smart Cities, 3(2), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3020028

Muhammad Elwan, L. O., Rahman, R., & Fitri Cahyani, E. (2022). IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM PENANGGULANGGAN PRAVELANSI STUNTING ANAK BALITA PADA DINAS KESEHATAN KABUPATEN KONAWE. Journal Publicuho, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.35817/jpu.v5i2.25130

Muqorobin, M., Rokhmah, S., Muslihah, I., & Rozaq Rais, N. A. (2020). Classification of Community Complaints Against Public Services on Twitter. International Journal of Computer and Information System (IJCIS), 1(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.29040/ijcis.v1i1.6

Natision, A., Esien, E. B., Harjo, D., Agoestyowati, R., & Lestari, P. A. (2022). The Effect of Public Accountability and Transparency on State Financial Management Mechanism: A Quantitative Method Analysis. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 3(1), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v3i1.433

Nurkholis, N., Dularif, M., & Rustiarini, N. W. (2020). Tax evasion and service-trust paradigm: A meta-analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1827699. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1827699

Pérez-Morote, R., Pontones-Rosa, C., & Núñez-Chicharro, M. (2020). The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154(March), 119973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119973

Prakasa, S. U. W., Asis, & Sahid, M. M. (2022). Reduce Corruption in Public Procurement: The Effort Towards Good Governance. Bestuur, 10(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v10i1.51339

Pratama, Y., & Pikri, F. (2020). Efisiensi Dan Efektivitas Anggaran Belanja Pada Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Cicalengka Kabupaten Bandung. Ministrate: Jurnal Birokrasi Dan Pemerintahan Daerah, 2(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.15575/jbpd.v2i2.9385

Rana, F., Ali, A., Riaz, W., & Irfan, A. (2019). Impact of Accountability on Public Service Delivery efficiency. Journal of Public Value and Administration Insights, 2(1), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.31580/jpvai.v2i1.480

Richey, R. G., Roath, A. S., Adams, F. G., & Wieland, A. (2022). A Responsiveness View of logistics and supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 43(1), 62–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12290

Roberts, P., Wertheimer, J., Park, E., Nuño, M., & Riggs, R. (2021). Identification of Functional Limitations and Discharge Destination in Patients With COVID-19. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 102(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.11.005

Sander, J. V. A., & Prathama, A. (2021). PUBLIC COMPLAINT HANDLING SERVICES ABOUT PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING AT THE DINAS KEBERSIHAN RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU SURABAYA CITY. Dia, 19(1), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v19i1.5146

Sun, F., Zhang, J., Ma, J., Wang, C., Hu, S., & Xu, D. (2021). Evolution of the Spatial-Temporal Pattern and Social Performance Evaluation of Community Sports and Fitness Venues in Shanghai. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010274

Swe, Y. L. W., & Lim, S. (2019). Associations between the Mixture of Governance Modes and the Performance of Local Public Service Delivery. Politics and Governance, 7(4), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i4.2218

Tan, E. (2020). Quo vadis? The local government in Turkey after public management reforms. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317752268

Tanesia, R. K. (2019). STUDI EFEKTIVITAS PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMERINTAH SECARA TRADISIONAL DAN ELEKTRONIK. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 14(4), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.24002/jts.v14i4.2000

Wahyurudhanto, A. (2020). Critical Reorientation of Bureaucratic Reform and Good Governance in Public Sector Administration in Indonesia. Webology, 17(2), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.14704/WEB/V17I2/WEB17033

Widajatun, V. W., & Kristiastuti, F. (2020). The Effect of Regional Financial Supervision, Accountability and Transparency of Regional Financial Management on Local Government Performance. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(4), 2966–2974. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i4.1319

Windarti, A. (2020). Is accessibility of internet financial reporting evolving towards more compliance of disclosure? EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 12(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v12i2.616

Wismayanti, W., & Purnamaningsih, P. (2021). PENGEMBANGAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK BERBASIS E-GOVERNMENT DALAM PROGRAM LAYANAN PERIZINAN ONLINE (LAPERON) DI DPMPTSP KABUPATEN BADUNG. AL-ULUM : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 7(2), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.31602/alsh.v7i2.5734

Yasa, A., Suswanta, S., Rafi, M., Rahmanto, F., Setiawan, D., & Iqbal Fadhlurrohman, M. (2021). Penguatan Reformasi Birokrasi Menuju Era Society 5.0 di Indonesia. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 20(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v20i1.139

Zaitul, Z., Ilona, D., & Novianti, N. (2023). Good Governance in Rural Local Administration. Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13010019

Zhou, Z., Chen, X., Li, E., Zeng, L., Luo, K., & Zhang, J. (2019). Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence With Edge Computing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(8). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2918951

Downloads

Published

2024-01-29