IMPLEMENTASI LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SELAMA  PANDEMI COVID-19: SEBUAH TINJAUAN LITERATUR

Wayu Meilastri Wulandari; Rahmi Fahmy; Hendra Lukito

doi:10.35817/publicuho.v5i3.19

Authors

Wayu Meilastri Wulandari Universitas Andalas
Rahmi Fahmy Universitas Andalas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0629-0665
Hendra Lukito Universitas Andalas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v5i3.19

Keywords:

Covid-19, learning management system, literature review, student, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to review the current literature on the implementation of a learning management system (LMS) from a student perspective during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, we develop a conceptualization and development of a hypothesis related to the implementation of (LMS) by using a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Using a qualitative literature review, we establish a new model and six hypotheses regarding the relationship between performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, personal innovativeness, LMS adoption, and learning performance. This model can be examined by future research.

References

Ahorsu, D. K., Lin, C. Y., Imani, V., Saffari, M., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2020). The fear of covid-19 scale: Development and initial validation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18, 1–9.

Ain, N. U., Kaur, K., & Waheed, M. (2016). The influence of learning value on learning management system use: An extension of UTAUT2. Information Development, 32(5), 1306–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915597546

Al-Busaidi, K. A., & Al-Shihi, H. (2010). A instructors’ acceptance of learning management systems: A theoretical framework. Communication of the IBIMA, 3, 1–10.

Al-Rahmi, A. M., Shamsuddin, A., & Alismaiel, O. A. (2020). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) theory: The factors affecting students’ academic performance in higher education. Psychology and Education, 57(9), 2839–2848.

Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018). A model of factors affecting learning performance through the use of social media in Malaysian higher education. Computers and Education, 121, 2–31.

Alasmari, T., & Zhang, K. (2019). Mobile learning technology acceptance in Saudi Arabian higher education: An extended framework and a mixed-method study. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 1–18.

Almaiah, M. A., Alamri, M. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. (2019). Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of mobile learning system in higher education. IEEE Access, 7, 174673–174686.

Chao, C. M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–14.

Coatesh Hamish, J. R. and B. G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and Management, 11, 19–36.

Decman, M. (2015). Modeling the acceptance of e-learning in mandatory environments of higher education: The influence of previous education and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 272–281.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Tamilmani, K., & Raman, R. (2020). A meta-analysis based modified unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (meta-UTAUT): A review of emerging literature. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.008

El-Masri, M., & Tarhini, A. (2017). Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2). Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 743–763.

Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A., Ayupp, K., Radovic-Markovic, M., & Sajid, A. (2017). Acceptance and use of lecture capture system (LCS) in executive business studies: Extending UTAUT2. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(4), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-06-2016-0015

Gunasinghe, A., Hamid, J. A., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (2020). The adequacy of UTAUT-3 in interpreting academician’s adoption to e-Learning in higher education environments. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2019-0020

Gupta, B., Dasgupta, S., & Gupta, A. (2008). Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 140–154.

Handoko, B. L. (2019). Application of UTAUT theory in higher education online learning. ICEME, 259–264.

Hosen, M., Ogbeibu, S., Giridharan, B., Cham, T. H., Lim, W. M., & Paul, J. (2021). Individual motivation and social media influence on student knowledge sharing and learning performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Computers and Education, 172(June 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104262

Li, L. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Accessing online learning material: Quantitative behavior patterns and their effects on motivation and learning performance. Computers and Education, 114(300), 286–297.

Lwoga, E. T., & Komba, M. (2015). Antecedents of continued usage intentions of web-based learning management system in Tanzania. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 57(7), 738–756.

Maphosa, V., Dube, B., & Jita, T. (2020). A UTAUT evaluation of whatsapp as a tool for lecture delivery during the COVID-19 lockdown at a Zimbabwean University. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(5), 84–93.

Marlina, E., Tjahjadi, B., & Ningsih, S. (2021). Factors affecting student performance in e-learning: A case study of higher educational institutions in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 993–1001.

Mazman Akar, S. G. (2019). Does it matter being innovative: Teachers’ technology acceptance. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3415–3432.

Meyliana, Widjaja, H. A. E., Santoso, S. W., Surjandy, Fernando, E., & Condrobimo, A. R. (2020). Improving the quality of learning management system (lms) based on student perspectives using UTAUT2 and trust model. International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS), 1–6.

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology, I. (2022). Higher education data of Indonesia. https://pddikti.kemdikbud.go.id/

Oguguo, B. C. E., Nannim, F. A., Agah, J. J., Ugwuanyi, C. S., Ene, C. U., & Nzeadibe, A. C. (2021). Effect of learning management system on student’s performance in educational measurement and evaluation. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1471–1483.

Oh, J. C., & Yoon, S. J. (2014). Predicting the use of online information services based on a modified UTAUT model. Behaviour and Information Technology, 33(7), 716–729.

Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2016). Adoption of online public grievance redressal system in India: Toward developing a unified view. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 265–282.

Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021). Social isolation and acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: An expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421

Salloum, S. A., & Shaalan, K. (2018). Factors affecting students’ flow experience of e-learning system in higher vocational education using UTAUT and structural equation modeling approaches. In Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST. Springer.

Sidik, D., & Syafar, F. (2020). Exploring the factors influencing student’s intention to use mobile learning in Indonesia higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 4781–4796.

Sitar-Taut, D.-A., & Mican, D. (2021). Mobile learning acceptance and use in higher education during social distancing circumstances: An expansion and customization of UTAUT2. Online Information Review, 45(5), 1000–1019.

Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A multi-group analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.641674

Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2020). Face-to-face, blended, flipped, or online learning environment? Impact on learning performance and student cognitions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 397–411.

Thongsri, N., Shen, L., Bao, Y., & Alharbi, I. M. (2018). Integrating UTAUT and UGT to explain behavioural intention to use M-learning: A developing country’s perspective. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 20(3), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-11-2017-0107

Twum, K. K., Ofori, D., Keney, G., & Korang-Yeboah, B. (2021). Using the UTAUT, personal innovativeness and perceived financial cost to examine student’s intention to use E-learning. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-12-2020-0168

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41410412

Yudiatmaja, W. E., Prastya, I. Y., Meilinda, S. D., & Samnuzulsari, T. (2021). A systematic literature review of the research on traditional medicine policy. Mimbar: Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 37(1).

Yudiatmaja, W. E., Yoserizal, Y., Edison, E., Kristanti, D., Tovalini, K., Samnuzulsari, T., & Malek, J. A. (2022). Adoption of online learning in Indonesian higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 17(2), 73–89.

Zwain, A. A. A. (2019). Technological innovativeness and information quality as neoteric predictors of users’ acceptance of learning management system: An expansion of UTAUT2. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(3), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2018-0065